tnfacts
Menu

Healthcare Lower is better

Shortfall of specialists at CHCs

Share of sanctioned specialist posts at Community Health Centres (CHCs) that are vacant. Covers Surgeons, Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, Physicians, and Paediatricians: the four core specialist cadres mandated at every CHC. Lower is better.

Tamil Nadu's chc specialist gap is 39.0% % of sanctioned posts (2022-23), per Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), Statistics Division.

Tamil Nadu, latest

39.0%

2022-23

Last verified

Change

+2.6%

2014-15 → 2022-23

Rank vs compared states

#2 of 5

TN vs MH, KA, GJ, UP · lower is better

Tamil Nadu's CHC specialist gap is 39.0% (2022-23), up +2.6% since 2014-15. It ranks #2 of 5 compared states (lower is better).

Source Official Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), Statistics Division Coverage 2014-15 – 2022-23 Sources & methodology ↓

About this indicator

This is the share of sanctioned specialist posts at Community Health Centres, such as surgeons, physicians, obstetricians, and paediatricians, that sit vacant, a direct measure of how well rural referral hospitals are staffed for specialist care. High vacancy pushes patients toward district hospitals or private care and weakens the referral chain. Because it is measured against sanctioned posts, a state can understate need by keeping the number of sanctioned posts low, so read it alongside overall facility and population coverage.

CHC specialist gap · 2014-15 – 2022-23

Tamil Nadu's CHC specialist gap rose from 38.0% (2014-15) to 39.0% (2022-23).

38.0% 39.0% 2014-15 2018-19 2022-23

Source: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), Statistics Division

Compare with Maharashtra, Karnataka, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh
2014-15 2018-19 2022-23
  1. 1 GJ Gujarat 70.0% 2022-23
  2. 2 UP Uttar Pradesh 60.0% 2022-23
  3. 3 KA Karnataka 45.0% 2022-23
  4. 4 TN Tamil Nadu 39.0% 2022-23
  5. 5 MH Maharashtra 36.0% 2022-23

Tamil Nadu highlighted. Each row shows that state's value and the year it is from. Compare like years with care.

Where this data comes from

The provenance of every value above and how to cite it.

Source provenance

All observations come from a single source.

  1. FY15 → FY23

    Primary

    Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), Statistics Division

    Rural Health Statistics (RHS) Annual Report

    45 observations across 5 states · Tier 1

Click any segment to open the source publication and verify the values yourself.

Methodology & notes

Rural Health Statistics (MoHFW). Shortfall = (sanctioned − in-position) ÷ sanctioned × 100, aggregated across the four core specialist cadres.

All values

Every observation, by state and period. Newest first.

Tamil Nadu

  • FY23 2022-23 39.0%
  • FY22 2021-22 40.0%
  • FY21 2020-21 41.0%
  • FY20 2019-20 41.0%
  • FY19 2018-19 43.0%
  • FY18 2017-18 41.0%
  • FY17 2016-17 42.0%
  • FY16 2015-16 39.0%
  • FY15 2014-15 38.0%
Maharashtra 9 values
  • FY23 2022-23 36.0%
  • FY22 2021-22 37.0%
  • FY21 2020-21 38.0%
  • FY20 2019-20 39.0%
  • FY19 2018-19 44.0%
  • FY18 2017-18 41.0%
  • FY17 2016-17 39.0%
  • FY16 2015-16 35.0%
  • FY15 2014-15 33.0%
Karnataka 9 values
  • FY23 2022-23 45.0%
  • FY22 2021-22 45.0%
  • FY21 2020-21 47.0%
  • FY20 2019-20 47.0%
  • FY19 2018-19 50.0%
  • FY18 2017-18 49.0%
  • FY17 2016-17 47.0%
  • FY16 2015-16 43.0%
  • FY15 2014-15 41.0%
Gujarat 9 values
  • FY23 2022-23 70.0%
  • FY22 2021-22 71.0%
  • FY21 2020-21 74.0%
  • FY20 2019-20 75.0%
  • FY19 2018-19 80.0%
  • FY18 2017-18 84.0%
  • FY17 2016-17 86.0%
  • FY16 2015-16 89.0%
  • FY15 2014-15 90.0%
Uttar Pradesh 9 values
  • FY23 2022-23 60.0%
  • FY22 2021-22 62.0%
  • FY21 2020-21 64.0%
  • FY20 2019-20 65.0%
  • FY19 2018-19 70.0%
  • FY18 2017-18 76.0%
  • FY17 2016-17 73.0%
  • FY16 2015-16 70.0%
  • FY15 2014-15 64.0%

Cross-state comparison (FY23)

Sorted low → high. Tamil Nadu highlighted.